I try as best I can, and for the most part I’m successful,
to keep books and their cinematic adaptations in separate compartments. They’re
drastically different mediums. You can do things in a book that you can’t in a
movie; novels have space to spool out and expand, while movies have a more
rigid time structure. No movie is ever going to ruin a book, no matter how much
it changes. And though I don’t expect that to happen in this instance, I have
questions about Alex Garland’s adaptation of Jeff VanerMeer’s
Annihilation.
First off, I’ve been excited about this movie from the get go. After Garland’s directorial debut, Ex-Machina, I’m down
to check out whatever he does next. It’s moody, smart, thoughtful sci-fi with
an impeccable visual eye. I hadn’t read Annihilation, but
from what I knew, it fell very much in that wheelhouse and felt like a good fit
between filmmaker and source material.
When I did read Annihilation, the first
in the Southern Reach Trilogy, I had a similar reaction. It’s
an esoteric, sci-fi, Heart of Darkness style journey into
the unknown that unfolds gradually as it goes.
Again, appeared to be a perfect fit. Even the first trailer showed off a dreamy, ethereal genre picture; a quiet, contemplative mystery that eschews easy answers. That was great. I was pumped. And I still am, even though everything that’s come after makes Annihilation look like a generic action movie. Including this new featurette that introduces a lot of running and shooting and creatures, elements that aren’t in the novel.
I know, I know, this is just a trailer. I
understand that it’s all marketing, and the story from the novel, though hugely
popular, is a hard sell to a wide audience. And that’s what studios want, as
wide an audience as possible.
I also understand the need to change things from the source
material to make it more cinematic. But from what we see here, the
interpretation of “cinematic” means action heavy. There’s not a ton of this
running gunfight, monsters jumping out of nowhere type of activity. It’s more
of a psychological thriller with sci-fi trappings.
The novel is about four women exploring a mysterious region
known as Area X. As they delve deeper, they begin to unravel, learn new information
that changes everything, and personal stakes ratchet up.
I’m not saying that Annihilation is
doomed or that it’ll be an affront to humanity and spit in the face of fans of the
book. In fact, it looks like exactly the kind of movie I’ll enjoy. It simply
doesn’t look like the same story; it looks like they eschew all of the elements
that set the book apart in favor of explosions and bullets and Hollywood
spectacle. Like they thought, “This makes people think too hard, throw in a
shootout instead!”
Again, the debate about adapting books to film is as old as
movies themselves. Things work on the page that don’t work on screen. (Part of
why I don’t particularly care for the first Hunger Games
movie is that, the book is a first person account of one character alone with
her thoughts. It works on the page because the audience is privy to the heroine’s
inner monologue. On film, because it’s just her with no narration or anyone to
interact with, we don’t get any of that, and the result is basically a quiet
teenager sitting alone in the woods looking pensive for 90% of the movie.)
I’m not necessarily worried about
Annihilation—I trust Garland, it has a great cast, and I’m
sure it’ll be fine on it’s own merit. In general, I’m okay with making changes,
as long as you stay true to the spirit and feel of the source material. But
there are many things that straight up don’t happen in the book, things that
look jarringly different and run contrary to the entire aesthetic and tone of the
novel. It begs the question of, if you’re going to change everything that makes
a work unique, why adapt it at all?
I’m surely reading far too much into a trailer and short
featurette. And I know that the production and marketing teams are two very
different arms with very different jobs to perform. But these are questions
that arise as I watch the promotional build up, and questions I can’t wait to
have answered when Annihilation opens on February 23.
No comments:
Post a Comment