The big special-effects-laden tentpoles studios release
during the summer months have a reputation for being empty spectacles and
little more. That’s not always the case, but we see a lot of loud, stupid trash
in theaters this time of year (cough Transformers 5 cough).
Over the last two movies, the revamped Planet of the Apes
franchise has shown audiences that there’s room for intelligence, emotion, and
nuance in the warmer months, and they prove it once again with War for the Planet of the Apes.
The title War for the Planet of the Apes doesn’t
paint an accurate portrait of the movie. It does indeed include large scale military
operations, and there’s an intrinsic struggle for control as the human race
creeps closer and closer to extinction. But the film transforms and evolves. It
begins as a Vietnam War-style picture, right down to the slogans scrawled on
soldier’s helmets—the opening is as harrowing a combat scene as has been put to
film in years. Then the story morphs into a tale of a distraught husband and
father on a self-destructive quest for revenge. And beyond that, it becomes a
Great Escape-esque adventure.
It’s easy to see why, if you’ve been watching, the marketing
for War for the Planet of the Apes has no idea how to sell
this movie. The promotion has bounced all over the place, but none of it hits
what the movie is actually about. There’s war, but it’s not a war film; there’s
thrilling action, but it’s not an action movie; it relies heavily on special
effects and spectacle, but it tells an intimate, personal story. It’s not the
movie that’s expected or one easy to pin down in a sound bite, and it rarely
goes the obvious direction. Which is why the end product is so fabulous.
Once again, Caesar (Andy Serkis) and his cadre of Apes just
want to be left alone, but spiteful humans who blame them for the Simian flu
that wiped out most of humanity keep poking the metaphorical bear. Hunted by
The Colonel (Woody Harrelson), Caesar suffers an unimaginable loss and seeks
retribution. On the surface, it’s simple and straightforward, though the
reality is anything but.
Apocalypse Now presents the most obvious
comparison point. Caesar embarks on a largely solidary, near-mythic journey;
with his shaved head and camouflage war-paint, not to mention his rank, Harrelson
cuts a Colonel Kurtz-ian profile. Similarly, his troops are more fanatics and
true-believers than rank-and-file soldiers. At one point, characters encounter
the phrase Ape-pocalypse Now spray painted in a tunnel, which I like
to believe the producers included to prevent jackasses like me from using that
in headlines.
While the narrative begins as an examination of the high
individual cost of revenge, Caesar, always driven by a sense of duty to his
people and those who depend on him, changes direction. And once again, he sets
personal drive aside to do what’s best for the Apes. Written by director Matt
Reeves and Mark Bomback, War for the Planet of the Apes
truly explores one character’s journey, which is both its greatest strength and
weakness.
War is Caesar’s movie, plain and simple,
and Andy Serkis delivers another phenomenal performance. Wrapped in digital
layers, he carries the story with subtlety, gradation, and incredible attention
to detail. He’s such a compelling protagonist, with a complex arc and moral
composition, it’s easy to gloss over that fact that none of the supporting
players have anything to do, even though they’re set up to be much more.
Steve Zahn’s Bad Ape is the most notable addition to the Ape
family. He essentially fills the role of an old, unhinged coot from a classic
western, a demented wing-nut tagalong. Obviously traumatized and warped by his
experiences, he has a sad, tragic backstory, but one that’s only hinted at
obliquely and touched on for a brief moment. Amiah Miller’s Nova suffers a
similar fate. A mute human stray picked up along the road, she’s delightful and
moving and provides an otherwise absent emotional vantage point—she more or
less becomes another Ape in the pack, which could have been an interesting
angle to explore. But only when she’s on screen. Which isn’t often. Both of these
characters feel like they had bigger roles in the script, but were trimmed
down, resulting in them being underutilized.
The special effects are flawless and so integrated into the
onscreen action it’s easy to take them for granted—especially three chapters
deep into the franchise, you scarcely notice the Apes aren’t real. Ape faces
prove so emotive and realistic that their existence is never in doubt; instead
of seeing meticulously arranged pixels, the audience simply sees seamless
characters delivering emotionally rich, textured performances.
The digital work is breathtaking in effect and execution,
which is vital to the film as there’s almost no human element. While the
previous films revolve around Caesar and the Apes, there’s always been a
significant human component. Sure the Colonel and his men are human, but their
fanaticism only goes so deep and there’s little more to them than that. Nova is
the lone good human character. War for the Planet of the
Apes spends the bulk of its time on the Apes, and rightly so, but
without the impeccable special effects, it’s difficult if not impossible to
pull off the gravity and profundity the film achieves.
For a movie with the word “war” in the title, War
for the Planet of the Apes features relatively little armed
conflict—Dawn of the Planet of the Apes has exponentially
more combat, while this becomes a more metaphorical war, a war for the soul of
the Planet. It dives deep into a bleak, pessimistic view of a crumbling society
that gives it an uncomfortably prescient edge.
The end, admittedly, drags out longer than necessary and
resolves a touch too tidy, but those are relatively minor complaints in the
grand scheme. Whatever the future of the franchise holds, War for the
Planet of the Apes proves a moving saga and provides a satisfying
closing chapter to what’s become one of cinema’s best blockbuster trilogies.
[Grade: B+]
No comments:
Post a Comment