As much a I love dystopian, post-apocalyptic, and otherwise
bleak science fiction—that’s kind of my jam if you missed my giddy excitement
for Mad Max: Fury Road—the darkness and weight can get
overwhelming from time to time. So I certainly understand where director Brad
Bird and writer Damon Lindelof are coming from with
Tomorrowland, trying to provide a more hopeful vision of the
future. Unfortunately, I wish they’d stayed where they were instead of
developing this smarmy, too-proud-of-itself movie.
Tomorrowland is a trite, saccharin genre
tale that, while pretty to look at, is more about leveraging Disney’s decades
of good will and wonder into an adventure. It never comes close to succeeding
on this promise, and leaves a sour, all-too-easy aftertaste in your mouth as
you walk out of the theater. That’s not to say it is entirely without merit,
the scenes of the titular land are absolutely stunning to look, and there are
interesting individual threads and themes, though they simply never weave
together into anything more.
A clunky framing device sets up a narrative that is all
backstory—this is seriously two hours of “getting there,” only you never get
anywhere. Casey Edison (Britt Robertson) is a brilliant, rebellious teen. You
can tell she’s special because as a child she could name a bunch of
constellations, but don’t worry if you missed that because the movie will tell
you over and over and over just how special she is. When she mysteriously comes
into possession of mysterious pin (mystery is the word of the day here), this
kicks off a great adventure that brings her into contact with Frank Walker
(George Clooney), a former boy genius turned curmudgeonly pessimist. Together
the reluctant pair embark on a journey to the magical land of the title, where
Casey just might be the key to saving the world.
Tomorrowland works best during the action
scenes when Casey and Frank must rush to meet their goal. Hounded by squads of
automated goons—and accompanied by a young girl robot, Athena (Raffey Cassidy),
who Frank is awkwardly in love with—there is an outside force compelling them
forward, giving them a timeline that Frank’s ticking doomsday clock never
provides. Unfortunately, these moments are too few and far between, take too
long to arrive, and are over so soon that they only provide brief respites.
The dynamic between Casey and Frank is very basic. He’s old
and bitter, she’s young and hopeful; he just watches the world tear itself
apart, she wants to fix the problems. Guess which side wins out in the end? Their
path is obvious. Robertson does as much as she can with what she has to work
with, even infusing her character with layers of doubt and ambiguity in a few
scenes near the end. She’s compelling to watch and carries the bulk of the dramatic
load. If nothing else, it’s refreshing to see a major studio vehicle with a
female protagonist, and she shows sparks here that indicate a bright future,
away from here. For his part, watching George Clooney, outside of one scene
near the end, just feels like watching George Clooney barely even try.
Overall, this simplicity is symptomatic of whole movie.
Tomorrowland, for as endlessly convoluted as the plot
becomes, and the script constantly piles on the details, the narrative is very
straightforward—they have to get to a place and save the day, done. Written by
Lindelof, most known for his work on Lost, the script continually
muddies the water with new information. The idea is that there’s a mystery to
unravel and they’re finding clues, but instead of being mysterious and
compelling the story is needlessly obtuse, keeping you at a distance exactly
when it needs to bring you in close. Every time you get one more partial piece
of information that adds nothing, but that the characters treat as a major exposé,
you can’t help but roll your eyes.
Extended monologues full of empty, watered-down
philosophical ramblings that flit around the point, again trying to be enigmatic
and shadowy, only to hammer it home in the most blunt manner possible a second
later, pepper the movie. Hugh Laurie, as the mayor of Tomorrowland, which isn’t
quite what you expect it to be, is a highlight of the supporting cast, but even
his dry, sardonic humor can’t save this.
Gorgeous to look at—Bird uses inventive match edits to
wonderful effect early on, and the rendering of Walt Disney’s utopian
futuristic vision is spectacular—Tomorrowland has no vision
of its own. For a movie that talks endlessly about inspiration and imagination,
it has very little of either, and talks about being full of wonder rather than
actually working to create that sensation. Obviously aimed at a younger
audience, it’s too tedious, the pace too uneven and jumbled, to hook even them,
and has little to offer aside from eye candy and squandered potential.
The aim of Tomorrowland is admirable, we
can all use a more optimistic outlook, but the execution comes across like an
unfocused, ham-handed, self-congratulatory editorial. [Grade:
C-]
1 comment:
Tomorrowland was terribly disappointing. The movie is supposed to be about inspiring the human race to come together for the benefit of out future, but instead it felt like a 130 minute propaganda commercial to sell the Disney machine as well as its licensed properties and corporate sponsors like Coke and General Motors.
Post a Comment