“Jack the Giant Slayer” seeks to answer that age-old
question, that query that has dogged mankind since the beginning of time: who
would win a tug-of-war match between humans and giants? Who says Hollywood is
afraid to make a movie about important topics? But while director Bryan Singer
may momentarily probe that deep, dark mystery near the climax, the film is an
empty shell, a blatant attempt to infuse the “Jack and the Beanstalk” story
with a grandiose “Lord of the Rings” scale, and there is very little to
recommend it.
Big and dumb, “Jack the Giant Slayer” feels like a movie
without an audience. The CGI giants burp and fart and pick their noses, feats
sure to elicit giggles and claps of glee from the younger members of the
audience. At the same time, it also attempts to be a violent fantasy adventure
with enough adult themes to keep older viewers interested. Trying to be light
and fluffy for the kids, moody and dark for the teens, and brutal enough for
adults, “Jack” fails on all three fronts. No one demographic is going to want
to sit through the entirety of this movie.
You know the story. Jack (Nicholas Hoult) is poor. Despite
his vivid imagination and head-in-the-clouds dreaminess, he has no hope of ever
being anything but. When he trades his horse for a handful of magic
beans—stolen magic beans in this version—things get interesting. For him, not
for you, the story is dull and bland. For example, there’s also Isabelle
(Eleanor Tomlinson), a rebellious princess who just wants to be free to explore
the world on her terms. She’s a stock modern character, because no princess
wants to be a princess anymore. They are, of course, completely compatible and
meant to be together even though the odds are stacked against them. See,
Isabelle is to marry Roderick, her father’s creepy old royal bro—a sniveling,
scheming, scenery chewing Stanley Tucci.
Hoult and Tomlinson are fine as the leads, but the
script—partially written by Christopher McQuarrie, which is why it’s
disappointing that this isn’t better—doesn’t give them much work to do. Maybe
they’re good actors, maybe not, there’s not a lot to judge them on, their job
is to look pretty and not get in the way of the CGI. There are multiple “he’s
standing right behind me, isn’t he?” moments, and at one point, I swear to you,
there’s an actual joke about judging books by their cover.
When Jack accidentally gets the magic beans wet, a beanstalk
of all things grows to the sky. Damn it, son, that monk told you not to get
them wet or feed them after midnight. Wait. Ignore that last part. It turns out
that all the childhood stories and legends about giants—Jack and Isabelle’s
parents read them the same tales as youngsters—are true, and that’s where the
monsters live, on a floating island the sky only accessible by beanstalk.
There are two characters in “Jack the Giant Slayer,”
however, that wind up being a lot of fun, and both, oddly enough, are veterans
of “Trainspotting.” Ewan McGregor plays Elmont, a sexy-haired knight sworn to
protect Isabelle. He’s a cartoonish hero in every sense of the word, and he’s
having more fun with this movie than anyone. Anyone, that is, except perhaps
Ewen Bremner, who plays Wickie, Roderick’s right hand. Full of an over the top
sociopathic glee, Wickie grins and giggles his way through murder after murder.
It really is too bad when the giants show up. Though there
are a few sweeping, breathtaking shot at the top of the beanstalk, overall the
green screen work is obvious and the real and the digital elements rarely mesh
well. The giants themselves are good enough, though most of them resemble Merle
from “The Walking Dead,” or at least generic hillbilly caricatures. They look
like massive cartoons, but that feels like an intentional choice on the part of
the filmmakers.
One of the main giants looks like a giant Chucky from
“Child’s Play,” running around with a Denis the Menace-style slingshot, while
the general, Fallon, is, literally, a two-headed monster. Instead of being
terrifying, or scary at all, one of the heads is a spastic, shrunken inbred. It
doesn’t say words, communicating instead via an assortment of farting sounds,
grunts, and laughs. Voiced by Bill Nighy, this one entity embodies problem
trying to please everyone at the same time. On one head he’s stern, grim, and
bites humans in half; on the other, he’s a gibbering simpleton who makes silly
noises you’re supposed to chuckle at.
Granted, when you get to the climax, the big, epic, man
versus giant battle, “Jack the Giant Slayer” becomes moderately entertaining.
You can just sit back and watch giants fling burning trees, and 12th
century Englishmen with rapid-fire crossbows. This is the second movie of 2013
(“Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters” was the first) where old timey folk have
repeating weapons. It’s possible that I’m that out of touch with ancient
military technology, but I call bullshit on that. Even though things look up at
this point, you’ve already waded through almost two hours of this nonsense, and
it’s too little, too late.
It’s a shame that “Jack the Giant Slayer” manages to
squander a strong supporting cast. I already mentioned Tucci, McGregor, and
Bremner, but Warrick Davis (“Willow”) shows up, as do Eddie Marsen (“The
Disappearance of Alice Creed”) and Ian McShane (“Deadwood”), in small doses.
They’re all okay, but nothing special, which is the overall feeling you walk
away from this movie with. There is nothing absolutely unforgivable about “Jack
the Giant Slayer”—I’ve already encountered a surprising number of people who
enjoy it a great deal, so maybe you will, too—but it’s flat, vacant, and never
anything more than people going through the motions.
2 comments:
The film Jack the Giant Slayer is not very good only good and the children may not still accept this picture.There is no logic in this film perhaps like to see at only one time and never next.Waste of time.
I've no idea whey so many negative reviews have turned up for this movie. It's now about 5 years old and I have watched it many times, it now being one of my firm favorite go to's when I want to relax and watch a flick.
It's a credible retelling of a classic fairytale, told in such a way that you forget it was a fairy tale.
The scenes mesh together well. Stanley Tucci (plays Roderick) unlike many non British actors, actually pulls off a convincing English accent, and I am formerly from Britain so that's saying something (need I mention Mel Gibson and Braveheart urghhh)
The telling of this story I believe appeals to all generations, from those old enough to remember reading the story or having it read to them at school/by parents, to those who may be seeing this story for the first time.
Probably the only failing grace (and it's only a small one at that) is some of the scenes where real life and CGI are seen at the same time don't always work (notably the point where the beanstalk fails and starts to fall), but overall does not really detract too much from the movie.
Post a Comment