Giving Academy-Award-winning director Ang Lee access to 3D
camera equipment and a modern-day fable like “Life of Pi” is the best idea
anyone has had in a long time. He plays so much with depth field, color, and
composition, that the end result is nothing short of breathtaking. Lee’s style
and mechanics are the perfect delivery system for an epic tale of survival that
borders on the world of magic realism. The heart of the story is, after all,
the tale of a young boy and his tiger bro, engaged in the quirky tale of
adventure, unlikely friendship, and an extraordinary existence. “Life of Pi”
watches like a fairy tale.
Pissing Patel (Suraj Sharma), better known as Pi—not because
his father was a mathematician, but because his real name leads to a vulgar
confusion among his teachers and classmates—is a searcher. Sampling major
religions, he attempts to create a sense of himself in the world, a world where
he is equally devoted to Vishnu as to Allah and Christ. As he says, a Catholic
Hindu faces guilt in front of hundreds of gods, and faith is a house with many
rooms. This quest for identity and divinity is at the center of “Life of Pi”.
An intricate, detailed childhood back story—one with enough
peculiarities to make Wes Anderson jealous—told from the perspective of an
adult Pi (Irrfan Khan), sets the stage for the main action of the film. Pi’s
father (Adil Hussain) decides to sell the family zoo in India, where his sons
were raised, and move the family to Ontario. In the middle of the voyage across
the Pacific Ocean, while Pi is on deck, dancing in the throws of a raging
midnight storm, the ship sinks. Pi is left stranded, floating in a lifeboat
with the only other survivor of the wreck, an adult Bengal Tiger named Richard
Parker. Richard Parker is so named because of a clerical error.
Much credit should be given to Lee, and to Yann Martel and
David Magee, the writers of the novel “Life of Pi” and the screenplay,
respectively. The bulk of the film takes place on a small dingy, with nothing
around for miles except open ocean, and where half of the living creatures
onscreen can’t talk. However, you’re never bored, and the pace never sags. More
than aimless bobbing on the waves, Pi’s daily existence becomes a harrowing
battle to stay alive—against the elements, hunger, dehydration, and a massive
starving carnivore—and to reach an uneasy state of truce and coexistence with
Richard Parker. This also speaks volumes about the strength of Sharma’s
performance. Asking such a young actor to carry the weight of an entire movie,
especially on as thematically dense as this, is no small request.
Visually, Lee uses the vast, apparent emptiness of the
middle of the ocean to present elaborate, stunning cinematic canvases. Among
other tableaus, he stages a fish storm that leaves his protagonist covered in
gleaming scales, sparkling in the sun like a mythic being as he searches the
skies for meaning, answers, and god. At times it feels as if Pi and Richard
Parker have come undone from the bonds and boundaries of this mortal coil, and floated
off into space, two more specks of light among the twinkling multitude of the
heavens. Never more than in these moments, “Life of Pi” is a lyrical, poetic
composition about one boy’s esoteric quest for spirituality. Flawless special
effects—from Richard Parker, to a celestial whale, and a living island
inhabited exclusively by an adorable colony of meerkats—create a fantastic
world where anything is possible, and nothing you see is a surprise.
Early on, during the first act, the frame story is clunky
and obtrusive. The scenes themselves are actually quite nice, as a struggling
author (Rafe Spall) interviews the grown up Pi. However, the transitions in and
out of these moments, and the accompanying voiceover, a constant companion, are
clumsy. This is the only big knock against “Life of Pi”, and it is a relatively
minor one at that. By the time you’re shipwrecked, where the core of the film
lies, the frame, like any good structure, fades into the background.
A stunning story of perseverance, friendship, survival, and
the quest for answers, “Life of Pi” provides just enough to justify itself.
Never stooping to blanket explanations and overly explicit solutions, it may
frustrate you if you’re looking to have everything spelled out. But the film
provides enough clarity that everything makes sense without ever feeling the
need to point out obvious meaning. You know it is something more, but as Pi
tells the author, why can’t it just be a story, why does it have to mean
anything at all?
No comments:
Post a Comment