The Giver is set in a bland dystopian
world where all color, joy, and emotion has been sucked out of life. Everything
that has ever proven even a slight problem has been removed, from all of the troubling
things that make us human all the way down to weather and even hills—walking up
a hill is hard, guys. This is a lukewarm, passive aggressive dystopia where
everyone looks the same, the sun always shines, and your family is chosen for
you based on what little personality you’re allowed to show. From a young age
you’re taught to use precise language, and despite the color scheme of the
movie, shades of grey are frowned upon.
Creating this world is both what Philip Noyce’s adaptation
of Lois Lowry’s beloved young adult novel does best, and is also its biggest
flaw. The film does such a solid job of manufacturing this vanilla tapioca of a
society and the people who live there that it’s hard to move past that. This
world is mild and tasteless, and ultimately so is the movie. There’s nothing
particularly wrong with it, but at the same time there’s nothing all that
noteworthy either. Unlike it’s contemporaries, that are more concerned with
action and melodrama, this is almost all talk.
The Giver watches like a subdued version
of that other YA adaptation from earlier this year, Neil Burger’s
Divergent—there’s even a sorting ceremony where, in a very
public fashion, young kids have their entire futures planned out for them. (Granted,
The Giver is a much older title, and many of the tropes and
stereotypes of the genre originate here, but we’ve seen them enough that
they’re still tired.) In the past there was some unidentified disaster that is
only hinted at. As a result, the Elders created this new society where
everything is supposed to be perfect, where there’s no hate, no anger, no
death, but of course, there’s a sinister secret hiding in the shadows.
When Jonas (Brenton Thwaites), there are no last names, goes
to get the job he’ll have for the rest of his life, most of his friends are given
tasks like drone pilot and caregiver for the young. He, however, is dubbed the
Receiver of Memory. Because all of history has been erased, there is only one
person in the Community who has access to the memories of the time before the
Sameness, just in case the Elders need wisdom or advice on a certain problem.
But with this job come certain liberties no one else has. You’re exempt from
laws regarding politeness, you keep secrets even from your friends, and are
even allowed to lie when the situation dictates.
Jeff Bridges plays Jonas’ mentor, the previous Receiver—now
the Giver—and he is easily the highlight of the movie. In a world where
everything is neat and tidy, you get one look at him, with his disheveled hair
and obvious disdain for his surroundings, and know immediately that he is
different in a world that eschews difference. Through their work, the world
opens up to Jonas. The Giver shows him color, music, sunsets, dancing, love, all
of the beauty the world has to offer. Bridges is obviously having a lot of fun,
playing a kinder, gentler version of his Rooster Cogburn from True
Grit. He’s definitely less foul-mouthed and violent, but there is a
similar bitter, sarcastic streak to the character that enjoys bucking the
system. Watching Streep and Bridges go head to head on screen is, admittedly,
fantastic to watch.
As Jonas’ world brightens, the film also transitions from
black and white to color, much like Pleasantville. In a move
that is sure to call to mind Luc Besson’s recent lunatic fringe actioner
Lucy, Noyce cuts stock footage into The
Giver to illustrate his points. You get the point he’s going for, to
show Jonas these things he’s never seen before, but it feels cheap and gimmicky,
and works much better when they use actual original footage. Thwaites is fine
in his role, and has a likeability and charm that is engaging, but the character
is simply so one dimensional and dull, and his course is so obvious and
predictable, that there’s not a lot of tension to be had.
Of course there is a flip side to Jonas’ newfound position.
As the only person with access to the collective memories of the world, he has
access to everything, the good and the bad, the joy and the pain. He’s
essentially the receptacle for all of the of the heartache and trauma of the
entire world. Imagine being the only person alive who knows the horror of war
and death, carrying the weight of that knowledge, and what it might to do a
young man.
This is where The Giver is the most
compelling, and where Thwaites and Bridges have the most to work with. Their
one on one discussions of life, love, pain, and loss are when you’re most
invested in what you see on screen. The problem is just that it takes the movie
too long to get to the point where the story becomes interesting. There’s so
much repetition as The Giver pounds home, time and time
again, the nature of this homogenous society, a point that is abundantly clear
within the first few minutes.
Perhaps it’s a fault of the oversaturated genre, but there
are no surprises to be found in The Giver. I’ve never read
the book, which since the late 1990s has become a staple of junior high and
middle school curriculums across the country. I get that this is where many of
these oft-utilized elements originated, but the story is paint by numbers and
banal. And it isn’t just YA conventions that come into play, the plot is damn
near identical to Brave New World, where everyone is
medicated and blind. From Jonas’ opening voice over narration, you know exactly
what is going to happen. Again, this isn’t a terrible movie, and it won’t
offend your sensibilities—it’s a damn sight more sincere and engaging than
Divergent—but, like the world it creates, The
Giver is bland and flavorless.
No comments:
Post a Comment